2019
DOI: 10.1108/ijqrm-12-2018-0322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost assessment of complex repairable system consisting two subsystems in series configuration using Gumbel Hougaard family copula

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to covenant with the cost assessment of a complex repairable system, consisting of two subsystems (Subsystem 1 and Subsystem 2) connected in series configuration and being operated by a human operator. Each subsystem has two identical units in parallel configuration and has different types of failure and two types of repairs (general repair and copula repair). Through the transition diagram, the system of first-order partial differential equations is derived and solved usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been a lot of work on systems with one main unit and one dissimilar unit added in parallel including Kumar & Sirohi [2015] and Singh & Poonia [2019]. There are some studies conducted on systems with three or more units including El-Damcese and Temraz [2012], Lado and Singh [2019], Singh et al [2020], Gehlot et al [2020] but in these studies all the units taken are identical. Here it is noticed that a system with one main unit and more than one identical units will be useful if there is a situation where similar standby unit cannot be afforded and dissimilar standby unit is not efficient enough to replace the failed main unit such a system is also analysed by Kadyan et al [2020] but they prioritised the main unit for operation which is not always necessary as discussed in the example where a person may wish to operate with solar panels although transformer is good as solar panels are economic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a lot of work on systems with one main unit and one dissimilar unit added in parallel including Kumar & Sirohi [2015] and Singh & Poonia [2019]. There are some studies conducted on systems with three or more units including El-Damcese and Temraz [2012], Lado and Singh [2019], Singh et al [2020], Gehlot et al [2020] but in these studies all the units taken are identical. Here it is noticed that a system with one main unit and more than one identical units will be useful if there is a situation where similar standby unit cannot be afforded and dissimilar standby unit is not efficient enough to replace the failed main unit such a system is also analysed by Kadyan et al [2020] but they prioritised the main unit for operation which is not always necessary as discussed in the example where a person may wish to operate with solar panels although transformer is good as solar panels are economic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shinde et al [11] estimated repair rate under performance-based logistics (PBL) technique. Lado and Singh [12] and Raghav et al [15] focused on the cost assessment of a system consisting two subsystem series configurations. In their research work, explicit expressions for reliability, availability, mean time to failure (MTTF) and cost analysis functions have been obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdul Kareem Lado et al [4] examined the necessary reliability measures for a repairable complex system comprising two subsystems using a supplementary variable to preclude repair. In the series configuration employing the Gumbel-Hougaard family copula distribution, Lado and Singh [5] examined the cost function and other reliability measures of complex repairable systems containing two subsystems different failure rates. Malik and Tewari [6] demonstrated a repairable system's effectiveness by demonstrating repair priorities in a coal-based thermal power plant's water flow network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%