2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-017-0816-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-aware horizontal scaling of NoSQL databases using probabilistic model checking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Decisions on adding or removing workers are modelled as MDPs. There is also existing work on cost-aware horizontal scaling of NoSQL databases (Naskos et al, 2015(Naskos et al, , 2017(Naskos et al, , 2018. These proposals are based on MDPs as well and they use probabilistic model checking as the main decision mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decisions on adding or removing workers are modelled as MDPs. There is also existing work on cost-aware horizontal scaling of NoSQL databases (Naskos et al, 2015(Naskos et al, , 2017(Naskos et al, , 2018. These proposals are based on MDPs as well and they use probabilistic model checking as the main decision mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the autoscaling perspective, the main technique for all the selected works is the formal method. However, only one study solely used the method 92 while the other researchers combined the formal method with other techniques such as Threshold‐based rules, 8,9,11,93 ML, 10 Queuing Theory 7 and Transformation algorithms 50 . In addition, the horizontal autoscaling dimension is more preferred over the vertical dimension as there are only two existing works found for the vertical autoscaling 10,50 .…”
Section: Comparison Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many autoscaling approaches have been proposed to tackle the increasing cloud workloads in microservice perspectives, however ways to guarantee the correctness of the policies used for the decision‐making are still unclear 6 . Meanwhile, the implementation of model checking in the autoscaling process is considered promising to ensure the quality of the decision‐making process in which this method has been used to verify cloud autoscaling which concerns several factors such as performance, 7,8 SLA, 9 reliability, 10 cost 11 and resources 12 . Model‐checking can provide assurance of several properties such as correctness and reachability of the autoscaling decision as well as guaranteeing the performance of the cloud service providers in provisioning resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ΟΡΙΣΜΟΣ 1.1 (Ελαστικότητα Πόρων). Ορίζεται ως ελαστικότητα η ικανότητα με την οποία ένα σύστημα μπορεί να προσαρμόζεται στις αλλαγές του φόρτου με τη δέσμευση και αποδέσμευση πόρων με αυτοματοποιημένο τρόπο, ούτως ώστε ανά πάσα στιγμή οι διαθέσιμοι πόροι να ανταποκρίνονται όσον το δυνατόν πιο πιστά στην τρέχουσα ζήτηση [98].…”
Section: ελαστικότητα πόρωνunclassified
“…Αναφορικά με τις ενέργειες ελαστικότητας, η παρούσα διατριβή, όπως και η πλειοψηφία των εργασιών, χρησιμοποιεί την Οριζόντια Κλιμάκωση, κατά την οποία μεταβάλλεται δυναμικά ο αριθμός των ενεργών ΕΜ, π.χ. [104,32,39,118,82,100,98,99,48,113,26]. Η επιλογή της OE ως κεντρικής ενέργειας ελαστικότητας της παρούσας διατριβής βασίστηκε σε διάφορα κριτήρια όπως:…”
Section: ενέργειες ελαστικής διαχείρισης πόρωνunclassified