2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2627955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Class Actions An Israeli Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 As it turned out, these requirements created significant barriers to class action certification (Klement 2004) In this respect, we should emphasize, though, that despite the apparent similarity between the Israeli and the U.S. class action procedures, the many differences in market size and structure, rules of procedure and discovery, and law firm characteristics seriously undermine the potential for Israeli law firms to rely on past experience in the United States (Klement & Klonoff 2018). 6 For a description of these statutory class action procedures and a comparison with class action arrangements set in the CAL, see Klement and Weinshall-Margel (2016). 7 We searched the three main Israeli legal databases ("Nevo," "Takdin," and "Dinim") for all class actions submitted from the enactment of the first law allowing class actions in 1988 (the Securities Law of 1988) to 2006, and found only 215 cases, mostly submitted during the 1990s.…”
Section: A Legal Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 As it turned out, these requirements created significant barriers to class action certification (Klement 2004) In this respect, we should emphasize, though, that despite the apparent similarity between the Israeli and the U.S. class action procedures, the many differences in market size and structure, rules of procedure and discovery, and law firm characteristics seriously undermine the potential for Israeli law firms to rely on past experience in the United States (Klement & Klonoff 2018). 6 For a description of these statutory class action procedures and a comparison with class action arrangements set in the CAL, see Klement and Weinshall-Margel (2016). 7 We searched the three main Israeli legal databases ("Nevo," "Takdin," and "Dinim") for all class actions submitted from the enactment of the first law allowing class actions in 1988 (the Securities Law of 1988) to 2006, and found only 215 cases, mostly submitted during the 1990s.…”
Section: A Legal Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… For a description of these statutory class action procedures and a comparison with class action arrangements set in the CAL, see Klement and Weinshall‐Margel (). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comment by Christoph Engel * Data are the oil that fuels the empirical legal movement. The paper by Klement and Weinshall-Margel (2016) comes with a full barrel of this oil. The paper is based on a complete data set of all class action suits that have ever been filed since Israel introduced class action in 2006.…”
Section: Does Class Action Have a Deterrent Effect?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the case may serve as a proxy for the risk that a case will be tried if it is positively correlated with the attorney's and the representative plaintiff's expected profit. This is not obvious, since the courts have discretion in defining both profits (for detail see Klement and Weinshall-Margel, 2016). Yet empirically this correlation is indeed observed (Table 1).…”
Section: Does Class Action Have a Deterrent Effect?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation