Space 2006 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-7211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost Comparison of Expendable, Hybrid, and Reusable Launch Vehicles

Abstract: This study compares the developmental, production, and maintenance costs (DPM) of two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) expendable (ELV), hybrid (HLV), and reusable (RLV) launch systems. This comparison was accomplished using top level mass and cost estimating relations (MERs, CERs). Mass estimating relationships were correlated to existing launch system data and ongoing launch system studies. Cost estimating relations were derived from Dr. Dietrich Koelle's "Handbook of Cost Engineering for Space Transportation Systems".… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where То is the UAV skin surface temperature, Т H is the temperature of the approach flow, which depends on the UAV/ILV separation altitude, r t is the boundary layer recovery coefficient, which is 0.89 for the turbulent boundary layer, k is the adiabatic coefficient, which is 1.4 for air, M is the Mach number of the approach flow. The cost calculations were based on the recommendations and methods given in [5,7,12]. The cost estimation plan is shown in Fig.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where То is the UAV skin surface temperature, Т H is the temperature of the approach flow, which depends on the UAV/ILV separation altitude, r t is the boundary layer recovery coefficient, which is 0.89 for the turbulent boundary layer, k is the adiabatic coefficient, which is 1.4 for air, M is the Mach number of the approach flow. The cost calculations were based on the recommendations and methods given in [5,7,12]. The cost estimation plan is shown in Fig.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where То is the UAV skin surface temperature, Т H is the temperature of the approach flow, which depends on the UAV/ILV separation altitude, r t is the boundary layer recovery coefficient, which is 0.89 for the turbulent boundary layer, k is the adiabatic coefficient, which is 1.4 for air, M is the Mach number of the approach flow. The cost calculations were based on the recommendations and methods given in [5,7,12]. The cost estimation plan is shown in Fig.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming at the development of more affordable, convenient and reliable access to space, the reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], such as space rider [10] and Skylon [11,12] have become a hot spot and received sustained attention during the last few decades. The RLVs will dramatically reduce the operational cost of space missions because they can be used repeatedly by quick recovering and reusing after each space mission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%