2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cl.2009.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-driven autonomous mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S = (CP U speed) · (1 − non AM P load), is used to differentiate the total resources of a location from the resources available for AMPs. The current research, like the previous AMP investigations [1,7,8], assumes that all resources of a location are available for AMPs, and the CPU speed coincides with the available speed, except the case of the root location where the external load is higher.…”
Section: Cost Model and Parameterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…S = (CP U speed) · (1 − non AM P load), is used to differentiate the total resources of a location from the resources available for AMPs. The current research, like the previous AMP investigations [1,7,8], assumes that all resources of a location are available for AMPs, and the CPU speed coincides with the available speed, except the case of the root location where the external load is higher.…”
Section: Cost Model and Parameterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Location thrashing is illustrated in Figure 1(a) which shows AMP movements in the experiments with the real system [1] based on scenario 3 (Section 3.1). In Figure 1 [8] incurs two performance penalties, namely the cost of additional communication and the cost of slower execution.…”
Section: Location Thrashingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations