Objective:
The aim was to compare the (sentinel) lymph node detection rate of indocyanine green (ICG)-fluorescent imaging versus standard-of-care 99mTc-nanocoilloid for sentinel lymph node (SLN)-mapping.
Background:
The current gold standard for axillary staging in patients with breast cancer is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using radio-guided surgery using radioisotope technetium (99mTc), sometimes combined with blue dye. A promising alternative is fluorescent imaging using ICG.
Methods:
In this noninferiority trial, we enrolled 102 consecutive patients with invasive early-stage, clinically node-negative breast cancer. Patients were planned for breast conserving surgery and SLNB between August 2020 and June 2021. The day or morning before surgery, patients were injected with 99mTc-nanocolloid. In each patient, SLNB was first performed using ICG-fluorescent imaging, after which excised lymph nodes were tested with the gamma-probe for 99mTc-uptake ex vivo, and the axilla was checked for residual 99mTc-activity. The detection rate was defined as the proportion of patients in whom at least 1 (S)LN was detected with either tracer.
Results:
In total, 103 SLNBs were analyzed. The detection rate of ICG-fluorescence was 96.1% [95% confidence interval (95% CI)=90.4%–98.9%] versus 86.4% (95% CI=78.3%–92.4%) for 99mTc-nanocoilloid. The detection rate for pathological lymph nodes was 86.7% (95% CI=59.5%–98.3%) for both ICG and 99mTc-nanocoilloid. A median of 2 lymph nodes were removed. ICG-fluorescent imaging did not increase detection time. No adverse events were observed.
Conclusions:
ICG-fluorescence showed a higher (S)LN detection rate than 99mTc-nanocoilloid, and equal detection rate for pathological (S)LNs. ICG-fluorescence may be used as a safe and effective alternative to 99mTc-nanocoilloid for SLNB in patients with early-stage breast cancer.