Cost-effective website failover through a CDN network and asynchronous replication

Kostadinov, Bojan; Jovanov, Mile; Stankov, Emil

doi:10.1109/eurocon.2017.8011095

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, if one server fails, the application will not be interrupted [Domanal and Reddy 2014]. Load balancing techniques are responsible for distributing the workload among the nodes in the cluster, while failover techniques detect which server is not functioning and redirect traffic to active servers [Kostadinov et al 2017].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Efficiency Evaluation based on ISO/IEC 25010:2011 applied to a Case Study on Load Balance and Resilient

Pereira,

Bezerra,

Nunes

et al. 2023

Anais Do XXIV Workshop De Testes E Tolerância a Falhas (WTF 2023)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The client-server architecture makes it necessary to implement techniques to overcome the single point of failure problem (only one server node). One of the most commonly used techniques is load balancing. Load balancing consists in distributing requests between nodes that provide a service (clusters). In this paper, we performed an evaluation based on the concept of efficiency included in ISO25010:2011. The balancers evaluated were HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) and ARR (Application Request Routing) with and without caching. The project requirements are limited using the IIS (Internet Information Services) web server. Load Balances based on caching presented the best performance in most scenarios, while HAProxy obtained better values related to CPU utilization.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%