2018
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost‐effectiveness analyses of anti‐hepatitis C virus treatments using quality of life scoring among patients with chronic liver disease in Hiroshima prefecture, Japan

Abstract: Direct-acting antiviral treatment was estimated to be cost-effective from 10 to 25 years after treatment, depending on the SVR rate of the drugs and the age of onset of treatment. In order to increase the cost-effectiveness of DAA treatment, measures or effort to improve the QOL score of patients after SVR are necessary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the high price of DAAs, the value and affordability of HCV treatment are controversial. Recently, it was reported that DAA treatments were cost-saving, and measures to improve the quality of life (QOL) of patients after SVR are necessary to increase their cost-effectiveness ( 3 - 5 ). In real-world clinical settings, the symptom burden, medical comorbidities, and functional well-being of patients with chronic HCV infection after DAA therapy are unknown ( 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the high price of DAAs, the value and affordability of HCV treatment are controversial. Recently, it was reported that DAA treatments were cost-saving, and measures to improve the quality of life (QOL) of patients after SVR are necessary to increase their cost-effectiveness ( 3 - 5 ). In real-world clinical settings, the symptom burden, medical comorbidities, and functional well-being of patients with chronic HCV infection after DAA therapy are unknown ( 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to sorafenib, treatment with lenvatinib resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 months (95% CI 6.9–8.8), while sorafenib treatment PFS was 3.7 months (3.6–4.6; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57–0.77, p < 0.0001) [ 18 ]. Recently, there is an increasing awareness of about rising health care costs into innovative and expensive pharmaceuticals [ 19 , 20 ]. The objective of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib compared with sorafenib for the first-line treatment of uHCC patients in Japan, using patient-level data from the REFLECT trial and considering total Japanese public healthcare expenditure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ambitious goal appears to be within reach thanks to the advent of potent and safe direct-acting antiviral-based regimens, resulting in a viral clearance in excess of 95% in most patients’ subgroups [2]. HCV clearance has been shown to be associated with the improvement of a wide array of clinical outcomes, such as hepatocarcinogenesis and liver-related mortality [3], but also with the restauration of innate immune responses [4] and an improved quality of life [5, 6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%