2019
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1588737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness analyses using real-world data: an overview of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of RWE is associated to many challenges, such as dealing with the selection bias, missing data, lack of accuracy related to drug exposure and outcomes, errors during the record-keeping process [43], and also to potential benefits. For example, it would enable a shift from surrogate outcomes to clinical and long-term outcomes and constitute an important source of information in the specific case of rare harms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of RWE is associated to many challenges, such as dealing with the selection bias, missing data, lack of accuracy related to drug exposure and outcomes, errors during the record-keeping process [43], and also to potential benefits. For example, it would enable a shift from surrogate outcomes to clinical and long-term outcomes and constitute an important source of information in the specific case of rare harms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that methodologies used to analyse and synthesize RWE will continue to evolve. However, little guidance is available on the relative merits of using RWE in the modelling context [43][44][45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as mentioned previously, these studies have some methodological limitations, such as confounding selection, identified by the authors of the studies in this review as the main potential risk. In another review [2], the main biases were confounding and missing data. A further risk in this type of information, frequent but not detailed, is registration quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we did not use it as, although it was complementary, it did not substitute the EE checklist and had some limitations such as not covering some aspects of statistical analysis. Moreover, this checklist did not allow a description of which specific statistical method should be prescribed to approach selection bias in analysis of cost-effectiveness [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inputs are based on data obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and do not take into account the use of DPP4Is in real-world clinical practice [12,13]. Real-world evidence from sources reflecting the budget holder's perspective, such as data from insurance claims databases, is now being recognized as a valuable resource for economic studies conducted later in product life cycles [14,15]. However, without proper adjustment, comparative observational studies using these databases to evaluate the impact of DPP4Is on the cost of T2D treatment are likely to be limited by channeling bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%