2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0564-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Physician-Implemented Medication Screening Tool in Older Hospitalised Patients in Ireland

Abstract: Based on the evidence presented, this physician-led intervention is not likely to be cost effective compared with usual hospital care. To inform future healthcare policy decisions in this field, more economic analyses of structured medication reviews by other healthcare professionals and by computerised clinical decision support software need to be conducted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trained physician applied STOPP/START criteria to the medications of intervention arm patients within 48 hours of admission and provided the details of the contravened STOPP/START criteria in person to the attending senior residents or consultants, supplemented by an individualized printed report. Although delivery of STOPP/START criteria advice by a trained physician is highly effective for ADR prevention, it is however unlikely to be cost-effective 35 . The SENATOR trial aimed to match the performance of the earlier single centre trial but in a multi-centre context using software-generated advice reports only (as distinct from physician-delivered and moderated reports) i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trained physician applied STOPP/START criteria to the medications of intervention arm patients within 48 hours of admission and provided the details of the contravened STOPP/START criteria in person to the attending senior residents or consultants, supplemented by an individualized printed report. Although delivery of STOPP/START criteria advice by a trained physician is highly effective for ADR prevention, it is however unlikely to be cost-effective 35 . The SENATOR trial aimed to match the performance of the earlier single centre trial but in a multi-centre context using software-generated advice reports only (as distinct from physician-delivered and moderated reports) i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%