2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Perioperative Oral Management after Cancer Surgery and an Examination of the Reduction in Medical Costs Thereafter: A Multicenter Study

Abstract: In April 2012, perioperative oral management (POM) was approved for inclusion in the national health insurance system of Japan to prevent the occurrence of pneumonia, a major complication in cancer patients. The subsequent decrease in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia indicated the prophylactic effect of POM. The constant increase in health expenditure necessitates a cost-effectiveness analysis. In addition, the effect of reducing healthcare costs owing to health technologies must be evaluated. In the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight studies were obtained that examined a combination of various types of surgery (two SRs and six observational studies) [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [34] , [35] , [36] . An SR by Liang et al [2] examined the effect of nurse-led perioperative chlorhexidine oral care and dental professional-led perioperative oral care on postoperative pneumonia and postoperative mortality in surgical patients, excluding cardiac patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eight studies were obtained that examined a combination of various types of surgery (two SRs and six observational studies) [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [34] , [35] , [36] . An SR by Liang et al [2] examined the effect of nurse-led perioperative chlorhexidine oral care and dental professional-led perioperative oral care on postoperative pneumonia and postoperative mortality in surgical patients, excluding cardiac patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six observational studies compared the patients with and without perioperative oral management, four of which analyzed big data from national health insurance databases. Five studies examined the effect on postoperative pneumonia, four [3] , [4] , [6] , [36] reported significant preventive effect, and one [17] reported no significant effect (all with low risk of bias). Additionally, Ishimaru et al [6] reported that preoperative oral care by a dentist was significantly associated with a decrease in all-cause mortality within 30 days of surgery (low risk of bias).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with diseases where poor oral hygiene is prevalent, such as head and neck cancers, as well as cerebrovascular disease, where oral microbiota can significantly influence outcome, the importance of oral care has been particularly emphasized [49][50][51] , with those reports indicating that an effective oral care strategy for patients with these conditions is crucial. Additionally, a multicenter study found that perioperative oral care during cancer treatment reduces hospitalization costs 52 . However, despite use of appropriate oral care, postoperative pneumonia has been reported to occur in various types of cancer cases 6,53 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who answer “yes” to this question in a hospital without a dentist should be consulted by an outside dental institution to resolve the problem if permitted by their general condition and surgical schedule. The universal health insurance system in Japan covers oral management at community dental institutions before surgery (Sekiya et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%