2019
DOI: 10.13157/arla.66.2.2019.ra4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness Assessment of Five Audio Recording Systems for Wildlife Monitoring: Differences between Recording Distances and Singing Direction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Playback volume was constant throughout the study period, with an intensity, measured as Leq (Equivalent Continuous Sound level), of 76.3 dB at 2 m, which is similar to the normal singing volume of males (Pérez‐Granados et al. ). Playback was audible (to the human ear) at a distance of up to 300 m (unpubl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Playback volume was constant throughout the study period, with an intensity, measured as Leq (Equivalent Continuous Sound level), of 76.3 dB at 2 m, which is similar to the normal singing volume of males (Pérez‐Granados et al. ). Playback was audible (to the human ear) at a distance of up to 300 m (unpubl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, the large detection radius of the recorders we used (up to 256 m, Pérez‐Granados et al. ), together with the high vocal activity of Dupont's Larks during our recording period (Pérez‐Granados et al. ) and prior validation of the monitoring protocol to detect the species even at low densities (Pérez‐Granados et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 ). Low-quality microphone recordings can also be used together with high-quality recordings when accounting explicitly for the different detectabilities (e.g., with occupancy modeling approaches), or for the relationship between vocal activity rate and bird abundance ( Pérez-Granados et al, 2019a ; Pérez-Granados et al, 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in ecoacoustics, little attention has been paid to the microphone specifications. Some studies have evaluated the effectiveness of different recorder types for birds ( Rempel et al, 2013 ; Pérez-Granados et al, 2019a ; Pérez-Granados et al, 2019b ) and bats ( Adams et al, 2012 ), and it has been reported that a recording system with the lowest SNR detected the least birds ( Rempel et al, 2013 ). Finally, Bardeli et al (2010) mentioned that automated detection of animal sounds could be impeded by worn microphones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%