Minimally Invasive Urology 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1317-6_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness in Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery

Abstract: When discussing healthcare costs, there are three payer perspectives that are involved: society, hospital systems, and patients themselves. Understanding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially labour loss, much more health expenses can genuinely effect on the government's policy. Therefore, urological societies and associations develop the guidelines to enlighten the way of surgeons and also patients [3]. According to last updated EAU Guidelines bigger than 2 cm calculi, PNL, between one and two cm depend on the features SWL and Endourology smaller than 1 cm stones should be under gone to SWL or RIRS as a first choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially labour loss, much more health expenses can genuinely effect on the government's policy. Therefore, urological societies and associations develop the guidelines to enlighten the way of surgeons and also patients [3]. According to last updated EAU Guidelines bigger than 2 cm calculi, PNL, between one and two cm depend on the features SWL and Endourology smaller than 1 cm stones should be under gone to SWL or RIRS as a first choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These costs do not encompass the price of individual robotic instruments, which are approximately $2,500 per instrument for 10 uses, averaging $250 per instrument per case. 10 The initial capital investment for a robotic platform may be mitigated by increase in its utilization, ultimately decreasing expenditure on a per-case basis. Nevertheless, increase in utilization does not decrease the per-case cost of disposable instruments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%