2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of a behavioral weight loss intervention for low-income women: The Weight-Wise Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Algorithms for mapping BMI into life years lost according to age and race profiles have been established[52] and used in cost-effectiveness evaluations of weight loss programs. [53, 54] Because life years gained from the intervention occur in future periods, all costs and outcomes will be discounted to present value terms using a 3% discount rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms for mapping BMI into life years lost according to age and race profiles have been established[52] and used in cost-effectiveness evaluations of weight loss programs. [53, 54] Because life years gained from the intervention occur in future periods, all costs and outcomes will be discounted to present value terms using a 3% discount rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Comparison with other studies is difficult because of differences in assumptions and model structures, but most published studies found costeffectiveness ratios for diet and exercise interventions similar to ours [38][39][40] unless weight regain was assumed zero. 41 Our study modeled the Australian adult population, but given comparable disease patterns, health care expenditure, prices and culture, the results can be considered indicative for other western countries as well.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Without a control group, we did not undertake a cost-effectiveness analysis, which is another limitation of this study. However, we have previously reported a cost-effectiveness analysis for the group-based intervention format that we tested in Phase II, comparing it with a delayed intervention control group 46. In that study, in which the weight loss intervention was considered cost-effective (assuming weight loss could be sustained over time), weight loss at 6-month follow-up was 3.7 kg in the intervention group, very similar to the weight loss of 3.9 kg observed at the completion of Phase II for our participants with diabetes for our participants with diabetes who received the group-based intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%