2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00042-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study showed that using AI in breast screening for low-risk women is the most cost-effective solution. Areia et al [ 279 ] conducted the Markov model for colorectal cancer screening with and without AI. The study showed prevention of 7194 colorectal cancers along with prevention of 2089 deaths, and finally a saving of 290 million USD.…”
Section: Critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study showed that using AI in breast screening for low-risk women is the most cost-effective solution. Areia et al [ 279 ] conducted the Markov model for colorectal cancer screening with and without AI. The study showed prevention of 7194 colorectal cancers along with prevention of 2089 deaths, and finally a saving of 290 million USD.…”
Section: Critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reimbursement and cost-effectiveness of AI are important concerns. In the field of colonoscopy, there are a few reports that suggest that the use of the CADe system may be cost-effective in reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer through improvement in adenoma detection and by reducing unnecessary polypectomy through accurate polyp differentiation [ 57 , 58 ]. Regarding the use of CAD systems for EGDS, its cost-effectiveness has not been fully verified so far; therefore, further research is expected in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prioritize reducing barriers to financial assistance and digitize traditionally paper-based applications to minimize processing and review times Widespread treatment-related financial harm [29] Financial toxicity Build evidence for payment innovation with the development of novel incentive structures to implement digital health technologies favoring value-based care Inadequate systemwide payment structures [34][35][36]…”
Section: Payer Policy and Reimbursementmentioning
confidence: 99%