2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in the Republic of Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study findings were consistent with recent cost-effectiveness analyses in the Republic of Korea and Germany, in which B-BR was accepted as cost-effective with more QALYs gained at additional cost. The comparable cost-effectiveness findings are possibly related to similar WTP thresholds applied for the acceptance of costeffectiveness (USD 46 182/QALY in Hong Kong; USD 23 636/QALY in Korea; USD 35 431-59 053/QALY in Germany), as well as the well-established healthcare systems in these developed regions (Park et al, 2016;Wirth et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study findings were consistent with recent cost-effectiveness analyses in the Republic of Korea and Germany, in which B-BR was accepted as cost-effective with more QALYs gained at additional cost. The comparable cost-effectiveness findings are possibly related to similar WTP thresholds applied for the acceptance of costeffectiveness (USD 46 182/QALY in Hong Kong; USD 23 636/QALY in Korea; USD 35 431-59 053/QALY in Germany), as well as the well-established healthcare systems in these developed regions (Park et al, 2016;Wirth et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The World Health Organization (WHO) subsequently recommended bedaquiline and delamanid as add-on agents to a WHO-recommended regimen in adult patients with MDR-TB (World Health Organization, 2013. In clinical studies, the use of bedaquiline or delamanid as add-on therapy to BR for MDR-TB has shown significant bactericidal activity and improved tolerability (Pontali et al, 2016;Sotgiu et al, 2015), yet the cost-effectiveness of adding bedaquiline or delamanid to BR has varied in different countries (subject to drug cost and healthcare resource variations) (Diel et al, 2015;Lu et al, 2017;Park et al, 2016;Wirth et al, 2017;Wolfson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervention type outcome in the assessment, and 11 did not provide separate results according to both perspectives so it was not possible to extract the data from the results. Hence, 14 articles satisfied all the inclusion criteria [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] and were finally included. With respect to the perspective used in the studies included in the review, half of the studies used both that of the healthcare payer and the wider perspective (the societal approach) in the analyses.…”
Section: Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,[42][43][44][45] On the other hand, 2 studies used the healthcare provider's perspective as the main perspective but included the societal perspective in the sensitivity analysis. 34,41 More details of the characteristics of the selected studies can be found in Table 1.…”
Section: Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) Cohort‐based Markov models and cohort‐based decision‐analytic model have demonstrated it is cost‐effective to add bedaquiline to a background MDR‐TB treatment regimen…”
Section: Mdr‐tb: Repurposed and Novel Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%