2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00671-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of Capsule Endoscopy in Diagnosing Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An International Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy has been confirmed in an international comparison, with cost savings ranging from C = 517 in Germany to C = 2240 in Switzerland [44].…”
Section: Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy has been confirmed in an international comparison, with cost savings ranging from C = 517 in Germany to C = 2240 in Switzerland [44].…”
Section: Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Whereas previous studies have shown that such lesions also occur in patients being examined for other reasons, or even in volunteers [50], a retrospective study found a higher rate of arterial (58 % vs. 22 %) and venous (52 % vs. 32 %) angiodysplasias in patients examined for ODB than for other reasons [51] ± but what is the authors' source for this differentiation into arterial and venous? Finally, a cost analysis found that CE with a prevalence of 50 % saved between C = 517 (in Germany) and C = 2240 (in Switzerland) in comparison with PE [52].…”
Section: Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%