Cost-effectiveness of community health systems strengthening: quality improvement interventions at community level to realise maternal and child health gains in Kenya

Abstract

IntroductionImprovements in maternal and infant health outcomes are policy priorities in Kenya. Achieving these outcomes depends on early identification of pregnancy and quality of primary healthcare. Quality improvement interventions have been shown to contribute to increases in identification, referral and follow-up of pregnant women by community health workers. In this study, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using quality improvement at community level to reduce maternal and infant mortality in Kenya.MethodsWe estimated the cost-effectiveness of quality improvement compared with standard of care treatment for antenatal and delivering mothers using a decision tree model and taking a health system perspective. We used both process (antenatal initiation in first trimester and skilled delivery) and health outcomes (maternal and infant deaths averted, as well as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)) as our effectiveness measures and actual implementation costs, discounting costs only. We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.ResultsWe found that the community quality improvement intervention was more cost-effective compared with standard community healthcare, with incremental cost per DALY averted of $249 under the deterministic analysis and 76% likelihood of cost-effectiveness under the probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a standard threshold. The deterministic estimate of incremental cost per additional skilled delivery was US$10, per additional early antenatal care presentation US$155, per maternal death averted US$5654 and per infant death averted US$37 536 (2017 dollars).ConclusionsThis analysis shows that the community quality improvement intervention was cost-effective compared with the standard community healthcare in Kenya due to improvements in antenatal care uptake and skilled delivery. It is likely that quality improvement interventions are a good investment and may also yield benefits in other health areas.

Community participation in the health system: analyzing the implementation of community health committee policies in Kenya

“…The community health strategy in Kenya has been shown to be a cost-effective approach for delivering quality maternal and child health services at the household level (Kumar et al ., 2021 ). CHVs are at the center of the community health strategy because they support the uptake of primary health services and, generally, they have built trust and credibility in their communities (WHO and UNICEF, 2021 ).…”

Quality Improvement in Public-Private Partnerships in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

“…While resources were limited, QI could also be cost-effective. All six studies evaluating the cost of QI programs in partnerships in LMIC found the QI approach to be cost-effective (23,54,122,(126)(127)(128)(129)(130). One author noted how local NGOs can compete for funding and resources but collaborative QI had the opportunity to bring them together to meaningfully collaborate and learn from each other (35).…”

Artificial Intelligence and Human Psychology in Online Transaction Fraud

“…Gartner explained how cyber security risks pervade every organization and are not always under the direct control of an information technology department. Increased cyber risk is real but so are the data security solutions ( Kumar et al, 2021 ). Solutions are costly but effective; for the banking industry, the wealth of numerous customers is at stake, and securing the cost of the system through AI is cost-effective management as less human involvement and training modules are involved.…”