Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomographic Angiography Before Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Abstract

Background-The risks of repeat thoracotomy can be reduced if thoracic multidetector computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is used to guide preventive surgical strategies (PSS: peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, circulatory arrest, and nonmedian sternotomy). We sought to define the cost-effectiveness of CTA using a Markov model. Methods and Results-We studied outcomes and costs of CTA and non-CTA strategies in a modeled cohort of 10 000 patients undergoing redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Rates of PSS implementation were anticipated to follow identification of risk by CTA. Transitions, costs, and utilities were informed by our experience and the literature. Sensitivity analyses included testing a range of costs of CTA and PSS on model outcome. In the reference case, cost and quality-adjusted life years accrued with the use of CTA ($74 869, 4.63 quality-adjusted life-years) were slightly higher than nonuse ($73 471, 4.59 quality-adjusted life-years), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $34 950/quality-adjusted life-years. Cost of PSS (equipment and operating time) was the most significant determinant of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.In the reference case (cost of CTA ≈$300), identification and avoidance of potential procedural difficulties with CTA rendered it cost-effective if the cost of PSS was <$12 000. Across a range of CTA costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was not materially influenced by outcomes across a broad range of imputed values. Conclusions-The cost of CTA appears justified in the setting of isolated reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting, because it aids in appropriate selection of PSS. The cost-effectiveness of this imaging seems more influenced by the costs of subsequent PSS than by the cost of CTA. (Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:705-710.)

Costo-efectividad de las estatinas para el tratamiento de dislipidemia en Colombia

“…De los estados de salud evaluados se encontraron 12 artículos, los cuales se agruparon por desenlace y posteriormente se realizó un promedio simple entre éstos. Finalmente, el valor promedio de utilidad para IAM fue 0.8 (57-60), ECV 0.595 (57,58,61,62), revascularización 0.9085 (63)(64)(65)(66), abandono 0,987 (7,13,57,58,(62)(63)(64)(65)(66), diabetes 0.755 (67,68) y para el paciente asintomático se realizó el supuesto de que estos pacientes se encuentran con salud perfecta, es decir 1.…”