2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
287
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
287
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Indeed, according to the recent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging and treatment strategy guidelines for HCCs, RFA is favoured over surgical resection for very early stage HCCs (single nodule ,2 cm) in patients with Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis. 4 Furthermore, a recent systematic review paper by Cucchetti et al 5 reported that for very early HCCs (single nodule ,2 cm) in Child-Pugh Class A patients, RFA provided similar life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy at a lower cost than did surgical resection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Indeed, according to the recent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging and treatment strategy guidelines for HCCs, RFA is favoured over surgical resection for very early stage HCCs (single nodule ,2 cm) in patients with Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis. 4 Furthermore, a recent systematic review paper by Cucchetti et al 5 reported that for very early HCCs (single nodule ,2 cm) in Child-Pugh Class A patients, RFA provided similar life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy at a lower cost than did surgical resection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] This is in large part owing to the limited ability of currently available RFA devices in creating a sufficiently large ablation zone encompassing HCCs 3-5 cm in diameter along with a safety margin. 7,11,13,14 Therefore, an ideal RFA system would provide the capability to create coagulations .5 cm in short-axis diameter within a reasonable time frame (,30 min) for the treatment of tumours .3 cm in diameter considering a sufficient safety margin (5-10 mm in thickness).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nodules less than 3 cm, surgical resection and ablative treatments are similar in terms of results obtained. For larger individual nodules (3-5 cm), surgical resection seems to favor a longer life expectancy and better cost-effectiveness than ablation; otherwise, in patients with 2-3 nodules less than 3 cm, life expectancy is similar for the two treatments although ablation showed a better cost-effectiveness [14].…”
Section: Early Disease Therapeutic Managementmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The size limitation of RFA has been overcome with the use of expandable tipped or cool-tip electrodes, allowing effective ablation of areas ≥ 5 cm in diameter [48] . However, RCTs with a large sample size are needed before ablation therapy can be confirmed as an alternative to surgery for potentially resectable HCC.…”
Section: Failure Of Tacementioning
confidence: 99%