2020
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1756232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of increased screening and treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Germany by contrast, after a cost analysis, the recommendation was to screen all of the PWID population while applying a less extensive screening in the MSM and general population[ 78 ]. Screening all South Korean patients twice followed by SOF/LDV treatment was cost-effective as compared to the current high-risk screening, while GLE/PIB was not cost-effective[ 79 ].…”
Section: Can We Eradicate Hcv By 2030 With Daas Treatment?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany by contrast, after a cost analysis, the recommendation was to screen all of the PWID population while applying a less extensive screening in the MSM and general population[ 78 ]. Screening all South Korean patients twice followed by SOF/LDV treatment was cost-effective as compared to the current high-risk screening, while GLE/PIB was not cost-effective[ 79 ].…”
Section: Can We Eradicate Hcv By 2030 With Daas Treatment?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our overall findings agree with previous studies that suggested the cost-effectiveness of universal HCV screening compared to no screening or risk-based screening in several countries [ 29 , 37 - 39 ]. In the economic evaluation studies of HCV screening for the Korean population, the universal screening was highly cost-effective as the estimated ICER was approximately $3,500–$9,000/QALY [ 8 - 10 ]. Cost-effectiveness varies depending on the healthcare system, medical service fees, treatment cost, and prevalence rate in each country [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the DAA cost per course in Korea was $7,300–$18,500 according to the genotype just a few years ago, but the current cost is about $9,250 owing to a voluntary price cut by pharmaceutical companies since the advent of the pan genotypic DAA [ 41 ]. As a result, studies conducted after the price cut of DAA suggested a much lower ICER [ 8 ]. In addition to the price reduction of DAA, increased acceptance of DAA treatment and increased medical costs of severe health states, such as HCC and DC, led to a lower ICER compared to that seen in our previous work, although the same model was used [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a nationwide epidemiological study, 0.78% of participants tested positive for anti-HCV antibodies after adjustment for age, sex, and area of residence [ 6 ]. Additionally, 30.5–46.5% of the population with antiHCV antibodies had detectable HCV RNA [ 5 , 9 ]. Risk factors for HCV infections include older age, needle-stick injuries, dental procedures, multiple sexual partners, blood transfusions before 1991, and surgeries [ 10 ].…”
Section: Natural History Of Hepatitis C Virus (Hcv) Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%