2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-007-2045-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery: first greeted with scepticism, now increasingly accepted

Abstract: Mortality rates in neonatal surgery have dropped markedly, illustrating the enormous progress made. Yet, new questions have arisen. To mention one, health care budgets have tightened. It follows that the effects of medical interventions should be weighted against their costs. As evidence was particularly sparse, we set out to analyse cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery. The purpose of this article is to summarise our findings and to review recent studies. Moreover, this article explains the relevance of cos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, the findings by Longworth et al 5 $355,195. [31,32]. A growing interest in evidence-based and cost-effective medicine has emerged [33,34]. Society increasingly demands to provide insight into whether the effects of treatment are large enough to justify its costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the findings by Longworth et al 5 $355,195. [31,32]. A growing interest in evidence-based and cost-effective medicine has emerged [33,34]. Society increasingly demands to provide insight into whether the effects of treatment are large enough to justify its costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing interest concerning the cost-effectiveness in neonatal surgery in the last decades [33][34][35]. In the current era of cost containment, it is increasingly important to demonstrate whether treatments are cost-effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,43,44 Challenging these arguments is that cost effectiveness has no standard definition, and cost utility (efficiency) data is not readily available, appearing biased in favor of neonatal intensive care. In neonatal intensive care, the priorities in health care needs are often topics that fuel distributive justice debates.…”
Section: Justicementioning
confidence: 99%