2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Versus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma After First-Line Treatment in China

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy (paclitaxel 1 carboplatin [PC]) in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma after first-line treatment from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. Methods:We conducted a partitioned-survival model with a 1-week cycle length and a 20-year base-case time horizon. Piecewise parametric models were fitted to KEYNOTE-006 trial data to estimate progression-free survival and overall survival for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study based on a partitioned survival model with a 1-week cycle length and a 20-year base-case time horizon evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as a first line in patients with metastatic or unresectable melanoma. Considering that an increase of 2.63 life-years and an increase of 2.24 qualityadjusted life-years was estimated, pembrolizumab emerges as an effective treatment option in metastatic patients as a first line and is also cost-effective, not exceeding the total cost of treatment the three times the per capita gross domestic Chinese [26]. This confirms that first-line therapy with pembrolizumab is not only an effective option but also an economically viable option in countries with a per capita product similar to China.…”
Section: Pembrolizumab Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study based on a partitioned survival model with a 1-week cycle length and a 20-year base-case time horizon evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as a first line in patients with metastatic or unresectable melanoma. Considering that an increase of 2.63 life-years and an increase of 2.24 qualityadjusted life-years was estimated, pembrolizumab emerges as an effective treatment option in metastatic patients as a first line and is also cost-effective, not exceeding the total cost of treatment the three times the per capita gross domestic Chinese [26]. This confirms that first-line therapy with pembrolizumab is not only an effective option but also an economically viable option in countries with a per capita product similar to China.…”
Section: Pembrolizumab Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%