2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness of Romiplostim for the Treatment of Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia In Portugal

Abstract: ment in chronic HCV infected patients with thrombocytopenia to enable INF-based treatment regimens from the Spanish Health System perspective. Methods: A two-phase individual-level model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of eltrombopag treatment in thrombocytopenic HCV-patients over a lifetime horizon. Individual-level models are more flexible and provide more accurate estimations than Markov approaches. One million patients were simulated using data from trials ENABLE 1 and 2 and local studies.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, no health economic analyses have been conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of romiplostim for treating children and adolescents with newly diagnosed or persistent ITP. In adult patients with chronic ITP, romiplostim has been shown to be cost-effective [52][53][54]. For example, from an Irish healthcare perspective, romiplostim was estimated to provide cost savings of €22,673 and gains of 1.17 quality-adjusted life years compared with standard of care in adults with chronic ITP [54].…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no health economic analyses have been conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of romiplostim for treating children and adolescents with newly diagnosed or persistent ITP. In adult patients with chronic ITP, romiplostim has been shown to be cost-effective [52][53][54]. For example, from an Irish healthcare perspective, romiplostim was estimated to provide cost savings of €22,673 and gains of 1.17 quality-adjusted life years compared with standard of care in adults with chronic ITP [54].…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%