2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost Effectiveness of Sacral Neuromodulation and OnabotulinumtoxinA in Managing Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was concluded that after 5 years SNM becomes a more cost-effective option, and prior to that BTX is more cost-effective, which is consistent with the findings of our study. 9 There were limitations in this analysis. Several assumptions had to be made, including the time of effectiveness of each treatment type as well as the frequency of treatments pursued by patients when analyzing long-term costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it was concluded that after 5 years SNM becomes a more cost-effective option, and prior to that BTX is more cost-effective, which is consistent with the findings of our study. 9 There were limitations in this analysis. Several assumptions had to be made, including the time of effectiveness of each treatment type as well as the frequency of treatments pursued by patients when analyzing long-term costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it was concluded that after 5 years SNM becomes a more cost-effective option, and prior to that BTX is more cost-effective, which is consistent with the findings of our study. 9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure can be performed under different types of anesthesia [ 29 , 30 ]. To be cost-effective compared to sacral neuromodulation, local anesthesia should be the preferred technique [ 31 ]. In our survey, we found that in German-speaking countries general anesthesia is the most frequently used type of anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AAM tedavisinde BoNTA ve SNM uygulamasının güvenlik ve maliyet karşılaştırılmasının yapıldığı bir çalışmada SNM uygulamasının çok daha maliyetli ancak yan etki görülme sıklığının daha az olduğu saptanmıştır (12). Dirençli AAM tedavisinde BonT-A ve SNM tedavilerinin maliyetetkinlik kıyaslamasının değerlendirildiği başka bir derlemede; SNM' nin daha uzun vadede, BonT-A'nın ise 5 yıldan kısa vadede daha maliyet-etkin olduğu belirtilmektedir, ancak çalışmalar arasındaki heterojenite nedeniyle genel bir yorum yapmak için uzun dönem takipli klinik çalışmalara ihtiyaç olduğu vurgulanmaktadır (13). Dirençli AAM tedavisinde BonT-A ve SNM uygulaması etkinlik mekanizmalarını ve tercih önceliğini değerlendiren bir derlemede ise; SNM'nin uzun vadede BoNT-A'dan daha iyi bir seçim olabileceği;…”
Section: şEkil-1 Sakral Sinir Stimülatörü S3 Transforaminal Uygulama ...unclassified