2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of speech and language therapy plus scalp acupuncture versus speech and language therapy alone for community-based patients with Broca’s aphasia after stroke: a post hoc analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of combined scalp acupuncture therapy with speech and language therapy for patients with Broca’s aphasia after stroke.DesignA within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.SettingsCommunity health centres.SubjectsA total of 203 participants with Broca’s aphasia after stroke who had been randomly assigned to receive scalp acupuncture with speech and language therapy (intervention) or speech and language therapy alone (control).InterventionBoth groups underwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There may be other relevant perspectives (e.g., those reflecting the interests of other stakeholders who are affected by the treatment) to consider. For example, Liu et al 9 studied the cost-effectiveness of speech and language therapy plus scalp acupuncture versus speech and language therapy alone for community-based patients with Broca's aphasia after stroke. The analysis was performed from a societal perspective, including all expenses related to the interventions irrespective of who paid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be other relevant perspectives (e.g., those reflecting the interests of other stakeholders who are affected by the treatment) to consider. For example, Liu et al 9 studied the cost-effectiveness of speech and language therapy plus scalp acupuncture versus speech and language therapy alone for community-based patients with Broca's aphasia after stroke. The analysis was performed from a societal perspective, including all expenses related to the interventions irrespective of who paid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Studies with experimental designs and outcome measures that did not meet the inclusion criteria; (6) Studies with unclear treatment methods and courses of treatment; (7) Studies with incorrect or unclear scale ratings or data that could not be extracted; (8) RCTs with a Jadad score of <3.…”
Section: Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have also demonstrated the therapeutic effect of acupuncture combined with language therapy. [7][8][9] However, there is a lack of strong evidence to support that the combination treatment is superior to single treatments for poststroke aphasia. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for comparing interventions because of their greater comparability and reduced bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Liu et al analyzed the cost-effectiveness of aphasia therapy provided to 203 individuals with Broca's aphasia. 31 The intervention consisted of scalp acupuncture coupled with aphasia therapy compared with only usual care (aphasia therapy alone). Cost-effectiveness was calculated using QALYs and ICERs and they found that the total cost of the intervention was €4,001.72 ($4,570.96) compared with €4,323.57 ($4,938.60) for usual care.…”
Section: A Need For Economic Analyses In Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%