2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2530-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost‐Effectiveness of the Ponseti Method for Treatment of Clubfoot in Pakistan

Abstract: The Ponseti method is clearly the treatment of choice in resource-constrained settings like Pakistan. Household costs for clubfoot treatment are substantial, even in programs offering free diagnostics and treatments and may be a barrier to service utilization for the poorest patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total charges that we incurred on each patient amounted to 71 USD, which was comparatively less than for the Turcos procedure charges of 96 USD and very affordable for the patients’ families ( Table 6 ). Our findings in this regard were similar to the studies by Gadhok et al, Ferreira et al and Hussain et al [ 22 , 32 , 33 ]. Since our study group consisted of patients coming from low-income backgrounds in rural areas, cost was a very important variable for the success of the treatment.Grimes CT et al [ 34 ] in their study also stated that the Ponseti method for the treatment of club foot is cost-effective and practical in a low-income country setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Total charges that we incurred on each patient amounted to 71 USD, which was comparatively less than for the Turcos procedure charges of 96 USD and very affordable for the patients’ families ( Table 6 ). Our findings in this regard were similar to the studies by Gadhok et al, Ferreira et al and Hussain et al [ 22 , 32 , 33 ]. Since our study group consisted of patients coming from low-income backgrounds in rural areas, cost was a very important variable for the success of the treatment.Grimes CT et al [ 34 ] in their study also stated that the Ponseti method for the treatment of club foot is cost-effective and practical in a low-income country setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We performed a sensitivity analysis by replacing our cost estimate with a previously published estimate of the cost of treatment with the Ponseti method in Pakistan; 34 using the same disability weight across unilateral and bilateral CTEV; and eliminating the discounting and introducing age weighting, a factor that gives a higher value to years lived as an adult than childhood, as proposed in the WHO guidelines on cost-effectiveness analysis. 33 The range from minimum to maximum cost-effectiveness ratios derived from sensitivity analysis was tabulated along with the average cost-effectiveness ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Hussain, H. and others., cost of the two clubfoot treatment methods were compared. The survey shows that the average cost of surgical method is more than twice higher than the average cost of treatment with Ponseti method [30]. There were statistically significant differences in all negative traits of the Ponseti and the Turco methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%