2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost Estimation Methods for Transport Infrastructure: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, other systematic reviews were searched to clarify the similarity of the review. From the search, Barakchi et al (2017), Hashemi et al (2020) and Membah & Asa (2015) published systematic reviews in construction projects. However, this systematic review differs from preview reviews (Barakchi et al, 2017;Membah & Asa, 2015;Tayefeh Hashemi et al, 2020) because this review has different objectives and using different databases.…”
Section: Results Scopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, other systematic reviews were searched to clarify the similarity of the review. From the search, Barakchi et al (2017), Hashemi et al (2020) and Membah & Asa (2015) published systematic reviews in construction projects. However, this systematic review differs from preview reviews (Barakchi et al, 2017;Membah & Asa, 2015;Tayefeh Hashemi et al, 2020) because this review has different objectives and using different databases.…”
Section: Results Scopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the search, Barakchi et al (2017), Hashemi et al (2020) and Membah & Asa (2015) published systematic reviews in construction projects. However, this systematic review differs from preview reviews (Barakchi et al, 2017;Membah & Asa, 2015;Tayefeh Hashemi et al, 2020) because this review has different objectives and using different databases. While all the reviews have an objective to support and improve cost estimation research, each review explored different approaches.…”
Section: Results Scopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations