Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions: Still a necessity?

Abstract

Although normalization of brain images is critical to the analysis of structural damage across individuals, loss of tissue due to focal lesions presents challenges to the available normalization algorithms. Until recently, cost function masking, as advocated by Brett and colleagues (2001), was the accepted method to overcome difficulties encountered when normalizing damaged brains; however, development of the unified segmentation approach for normalization in SPM5 (Ashburner & Friston, 2005) offered an alternative. Crinion et al. (2007) demonstrated this approach produced normalization results without cost function masking that appeared to be robust to lesion effects when tested using the same simulated lesions studied by Brett et al. (2001). The present study sought to confirm the validity of this approach in brains with focal damage due to vascular events. To do so, we examined outcomes of normalization using unified segmentation with and without cost function masking in 49 brain images with chronic stroke. Lesion masks were created using two approaches (precise and rough drawings of lesion boundaries), and normalization was implemented with both smoothed and unsmoothed versions of the masks. We found that failure to employ cost function masking produced less accurate results in real and simulated lesions, compared to masked normalization, both in terms of deformation field displacement and voxelwise intensity differences. Additionally, unmasked normalization led to significant underestimation of lesion volume relative to all four masking conditions, especially in patients with large lesions. Taken together, these findings suggest cost function masking is still necessary when normalizing brain images with chronic infarcts.

Neural Basis of Acquired Amusia and Its Recovery after Stroke

“…Unified segmentation (Ashburner and Friston, 2005) with medium regularization and CFM was applied to T1 images, segmenting them precisely into GM, WM, and CSF probability maps before normalizing them into the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. This technique has been widely used with stroke patients (Crinion et al, 2007;Andersen et al, 2010;Ripollés et al, 2012). To preserve the original signal strength during the normalization, GM and WM segmented images were modulated.…”

Neural Reorganization Due to Neonatal Amygdala Lesions in the Rhesus Monkey: Changes in Morphology and Network Structure

“…All subjects were then re-registered onto the template images, using constrained cost-function masking (CCFM) of the lesions, which were manually traced (DSG) for each case. CCFM has been shown to substantially improve the mapping of lesioned brain data (Andersen et al 2010), particularly when used with ANTS-SyN (Ripolles et al 2012). Regional and voxelwise morphometric analyses were conducted on the 12-year dataset to facilitate comparison with the DWI analyses.…”

Functional reorganization of the attentional networks in low-grade glioma patients: A longitudinal study

“…Because the presence of the lesion can induce distortions during the normalization process, we used cost function masking (Brett, Leff, Rorden, & Ashburner, 2001;Andersen, Rapcsak, & Beeson, 2010). In a first step, individual resection cavities were manually drawn using MRIcron software (http://www.mccauslandcenter.sc.edu/ mricro/mricron).…”