2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.2277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost Implications Of Tedizolid Introduction For The Treatment Of Complicated Skin And Soft Tissue Infections In A Russian Multi-Field Hospital

Abstract: treatment is expected to result in an additional 31,333 patients achieving SVR in 2017/18, with a net budget impact of ¥18.90 million in 2017 and-¥0.07 million in 2018. ConClusions: Introducing DUAL treatment for HCV in China is predicted to offer significant health-related benefit and a reduction in total lifetime cost, whilst having minimal impact (approximately 0.001% of total Chinese reimbursement expenditure) on total 2017/18 budget. PIN22 Budget ImPact Of INtrOducINg ceftazIdIme-avIBactam (caz-avI) fOr c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5456 A first important point to be taken into account is the possibility of shorter treatment courses in comparison with other alternatives, including linezolid. In a simulated cohort of 100 inpatients, potential savings of €39,348 were projected by replacing linezolid with tedizolid for the treatment of suspected ABSSSI due to MRSA over a 1-year period 57,58. Notably, projections became cost-ineffective for simulated tedizolid treatment courses ≥9 days 57…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5456 A first important point to be taken into account is the possibility of shorter treatment courses in comparison with other alternatives, including linezolid. In a simulated cohort of 100 inpatients, potential savings of €39,348 were projected by replacing linezolid with tedizolid for the treatment of suspected ABSSSI due to MRSA over a 1-year period 57,58. Notably, projections became cost-ineffective for simulated tedizolid treatment courses ≥9 days 57…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a simulated cohort of 100 inpatients, potential savings of €39,348 were projected by replacing linezolid with tedizolid for the treatment of suspected ABSSSI due to MRSA over a 1-year period 57,58. Notably, projections became cost-ineffective for simulated tedizolid treatment courses ≥9 days 57Figure 1Potential algorithm for considering tedizolid-based early switch (ES) to oral therapy and early discharge (ED) in patients with ABSSI. Note: Potential predictors of MRSA and factors indicating suitability for ES/ED have been extrapolated from the literature; data from references 54 and 55. Abbreviations: ABSSSI, acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection; LRINEC, laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis; MRSA, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; WBCs, white blood cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%