2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost of Intraocular Lens versus Contact Lens Treatment after Unilateral Congenital Cataract Surgery: Retrospective Analysis at Age 1 Year

Abstract: Purpose To describe the differences in treatment costs for infants randomized to contact lens correction versus primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after unilateral cataract surgery in The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. Design Retrospective cost analysis of a prospective, randomized clinical trial based on Georgia Medicaid data and the actual costs of supplies used. Participants The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study (IATS) is a randomized, multicenter (n=12) clinical trial comparing treatment of apha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(27) Theoretical advantages of primary IOL implantation at the time of cataract surgery in infants include having a constant, albeit partial, optical correction during the early years of visual development, the ability to place the IOL within the capsular bag and the avoidance of contact lens use with the associated cost and effort required of the child’s caregivers. (8, 9) Advantages of leaving the baby aphakic and visually rehabilitating the eye with a contact lens include the ability to change the contact lens power as needed to keep up with the rapidly growing eye’s refractive needs, not subjecting the baby to the increased rate of complications and subsequent need for additional surgeries associated with IOL implantation and not requiring spectacle wear during the first few years of life. (1018)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(27) Theoretical advantages of primary IOL implantation at the time of cataract surgery in infants include having a constant, albeit partial, optical correction during the early years of visual development, the ability to place the IOL within the capsular bag and the avoidance of contact lens use with the associated cost and effort required of the child’s caregivers. (8, 9) Advantages of leaving the baby aphakic and visually rehabilitating the eye with a contact lens include the ability to change the contact lens power as needed to keep up with the rapidly growing eye’s refractive needs, not subjecting the baby to the increased rate of complications and subsequent need for additional surgeries associated with IOL implantation and not requiring spectacle wear during the first few years of life. (1018)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, significantly more intra- and postoperative adverse events and additional intraocular operations occurred in the IOL group. 7 Also, the mean cost of treatment was 38% higher in the IOL group 10 and parenting stress was higher among caregivers in the IOL group 3 months after cataract surgery. 11 This paper reports the visual acuity outcomes using the HOTV test at age 4.5 years and the clinical findings at age 5 years by treatment group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79 Additional intraocular surgeries are often required to treat these adverse events which are associated with risks, costs and parental stress. 10,11 Furthermore, the rapid and somewhat unpredictable growth of infant eyes makes it difficult to select the ideal IOL power to implant. 12,13 Although it is generally agreed that cataract surgery during early infancy is associated with the best visual outcomes, 14–16 it remains undetermined whether primary IOL implantation is advisable in this age group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was also noted that the average cost of supplies was three times higher in the CL group ($1600 per patient) versus the IOL group ($535 per patient). 4 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%