2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost sharing solutions defined by non-negative eigenvectors

Abstract: The problem of sharing a cost M among n individuals, identified by some characteristic c i ∈ R + , appears in many real situations. Two important proposals on how to share the cost are the egalitarian and the proportional solutions. In different situations a combination of both distributions provides an interesting approach to the cost sharing problem. In this paper we obtain a family of (compromise) solutions associated to the Perron' eigenvectors of Levinger's transformations of a characteristics matrix A. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, for each problem, the formal definition of a rule already includes the requirement that awards be nonnegative, which represents a lower bound on awards. In fact, there are some solutions that always ensure a strictly positive quantity to each agent (with positive claim): this is the case of the constrained equal awards rule (Maimonides 2000), the α min solution (Giménez-Gómez and Peris 2014), or solutions that are defined by positive eigenvectors (Subiza et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, for each problem, the formal definition of a rule already includes the requirement that awards be nonnegative, which represents a lower bound on awards. In fact, there are some solutions that always ensure a strictly positive quantity to each agent (with positive claim): this is the case of the constrained equal awards rule (Maimonides 2000), the α min solution (Giménez-Gómez and Peris 2014), or solutions that are defined by positive eigenvectors (Subiza et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%