Cost–utility analysis in educational needs assessment

Abstract

Educational needs assessments (hereafter NAs) are inattentive to cost considerations and are frequently dominated by elite stakeholder groups. In this article I make a case for adopting a cost-utility approach, illustrating the argument with data generated in a NA of central library services in a Canadian school district. Using survey data from eight stakeholder groups, I found that (1) NAs based on the service preferences of a single stakeholder group can be misleading; (2) service preferences can be integrated into a single set of priorities, even when there are disagreements, by using the stakeholder group as the unit of analysis and assigning weights that privilege input from knowledgeable respondents; (3) that the ranking of service operations produced by user preferences was not significantly correlated with the ranking produced by integrating preferences with costs. Cost-utility analysis would be more helpful if the utilities represented rigorously determined benefits of the services assessed, as well as stakeholder perceptions of the value of these benefits. Cost-utility analysis in NA will not reach its potential until cost considerations are routinely included in educational program evaluations.

The “Intrinsic Value” of Cultural Heritage as Driver for Circular Human-Centered Adaptive Reuse

“…Furthermore, the integration of an approach based on instrumental values (assessed with economic tools) and intrinsic values may improve more choices in planning and management processes. This integrates quantitative approaches of a positivist nature (such those of natural and economic sciences) with approaches of constructivist/interpretative nature (non-quantitative) used by human sciences (i.e., anthropology, history, sociology, etc.,) [145]. This should lead to sustainable BMs being able to fully realize the CE, contributing to the sustainable development of the ecosystem as a whole.…”

Research Worth Using: (Re)Framing Research Evidence Quality for Educational Policymaking and Practice

“…M. Levin & Belfield, 2015), or utility, as perceived by various decision makers and stakeholders (Hollands et al, 2019). Impact may alternately be measured with respect to a needs assessment (Watkins et al, 2012), with improvements addressing more urgent needs receiving higher utility values (Ross, 2008). Quantifying impact should consider its extent, durability, and distribution (H.…”

Development of Authentic Assessment in TVET

“…Research reports from various countries such as Canada, Saudi Arabia, Kenys, Germany, and Qana are important examples such as Molgat et al & Baqadir et al [35,36] The research findings by Baqadir, et al show the aspects needed for adjusting such education by working on the following requirements [36]: (a) authentic, practical knowledge of technological developments and trends in manufacturing industries obtained through attendance at workshops and seminars organized by the manufacturing industry; (b) internship: for example the importance of increasing learning through 'entering fields', 'participant observation' and 'portfolio records of practical aspects of research related to manufacturing'; (c) interpersonal communication skills and critical thinking skills; Azreen and Mohamad also discussed that in TVET, we must consider the work team's skills, critical thinking, problem solving and professional ethics. Practically speaking, assessment of educational needs is a series of procedures and methods applied to determine education priorities [37].…”