“…This behavior is also unconfounded by threat overestimation or risk aversion, since these confounds are induced by the instrumentality of information. Previous research has shown that humans and other animals behave as though noninstrumental information has an intrinsic value, and will even pay an explicit cost (such as a monetary cost, a wait-time cost, or foregone primary reward) to acquire it (Bennett et al, 2016; Blanchard, Hayden, & Bromberg-Martin, 2015; Bromberg-Martin & Hikosaka, 2009, 2011; Brydevall et al, 2018; Charpentier, Bromberg-Martin, & Sharot, 2018; Iigaya, Story, Kurth-Nelson, Dolan, & Dayan, 2016; Kobayashi, Ravaioli, Baranès, Woodford, & Gottlieb, 2019; Rodriguez Cabrero, Zhu, & Ludvig, 2019; van Lieshout, Vandenbroucke, Müller, Cools, & de Lange, 2018; Vasconcelos, Monteiro, & Kacelnik, 2015), even though this leads to a reduction in future expected reward. In humans, there is marked heterogeneity in the strength of this preference (Bennett et al, 2016), suggesting individual differences in aversion to uncertainty that resemble those proposed in theories of obsessive-compulsion and anxiety (Krohne, 1993; Sorrentino et al, 1990).…”