2014
DOI: 10.3109/21679169.2014.886291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and outcomes of an exercise referral programme – A 1-year follow-up study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten quantitative, 10 qualitative, and four mixed‐methods studies were included. Two studies were assessed as high quality, 17 studies were assessed as moderate quality, and five studies were assessed as low quality. Twenty‐one of the 24 studies were UK‐based, with one study each from Netherlands, Sweden, and United States.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ten quantitative, 10 qualitative, and four mixed‐methods studies were included. Two studies were assessed as high quality, 17 studies were assessed as moderate quality, and five studies were assessed as low quality. Twenty‐one of the 24 studies were UK‐based, with one study each from Netherlands, Sweden, and United States.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 There were no differences between adherers and non-adherers in self-efficacy and expectations of change for health and fitness. 52 Where an ERS intervention was compared to controls, there were no reported baseline differences between participants in different doses of exercise in motivation, 57 or between ERS participants and controls in physical self-worth, 61 self-perception, 61 self-efficacy, 62 perceived benefits and barriers, 62…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite these challenges, the prescription approach has previously been found effective in changing lifestyle behaviour when clear advice was given and prescribed with the same conviction as a drug [ 15 ]. Studies have shown that PAP increases self-efficacy [ 47 ] and physical activity, while decreasing the proportion of inactive individuals and reducing costs for inactivity by 22 % [ 48 ]. The adherence to PAP has further been found to be similar to that of other treatments for chronic diseases [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%