2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2020.104656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and rewards in priced timed automata

Abstract: We consider Pareto analysis of reachable states of multi-priced timed automata (MPTA): timed automata equipped with multiple observers that keep track of costs (to be minimised) and rewards (to be maximised) along a computation. Each observer has a constant non-negative derivative which may depend on the location of the MPTA. We study the Pareto Domination Problem, which asks whether it is possible to reach a target location via a run in which the accumulated costs and rewards Pareto dominate a given objective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the rest of the cycle has cost/reward 1/0, then the better ratio is 3/3, and if it has 0/2, then the better ratio is 1/3. While this could be dealt with multi-objective search (Fränzle et al 2022;Larsen and Rasmussen 2008), maintaining the entire Pareto front for each clock valuation is unnecessary because we are interested on a single objective: the minimum ratio. Gondran and Minoux (1995) show how to overcome this problem by combining the cost and reward into a single weight, and then incrementally finding better solutions (according to the current weight) until the optimal is found.…”
Section: Anytime λ-Deduction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the rest of the cycle has cost/reward 1/0, then the better ratio is 3/3, and if it has 0/2, then the better ratio is 1/3. While this could be dealt with multi-objective search (Fränzle et al 2022;Larsen and Rasmussen 2008), maintaining the entire Pareto front for each clock valuation is unnecessary because we are interested on a single objective: the minimum ratio. Gondran and Minoux (1995) show how to overcome this problem by combining the cost and reward into a single weight, and then incrementally finding better solutions (according to the current weight) until the optimal is found.…”
Section: Anytime λ-Deduction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%