Costs of measures to control tuberculosis/HIV in public primary care facilities in Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Objective To measure the costs and estimate the cost-effectiveness of the ProTEST package of tuberculosis/human immunodeficiency virus (TB/HIV) interventions in primary health care facilities in Cape Town, South Africa. Methods We collected annual cost data retrospectively using ingredients-based costing in three primary care facilities and estimated the cost per HIV infection averted and the cost per TB case prevented. Findings The range of costs per person for the ProTEST interventions in the three facilities were: US$ 7-11 for voluntary counselling and testing (VCT), US$ 81-166 for detecting a TB case, US$ 92-183 for completing isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) and US$ 20-44 for completing six months of cotrimoxazole preventive therapy. The estimated cost per HIV infection averted by VCT was US$ 67-112. The cost per TB case prevented by VCT (through preventing HIV) was US$ 129-215, by intensified case finding was US$ 323-664 and by IPT was US$ 486-962. Sensitivity analysis showed that the use of chest X-rays for IPT screening decreases the cost-effectiveness of IPT in preventing TB cases by 36%. IPT screening with or without tuberculin purified protein derivative screening was almost equally cost-effective. Conclusion We conclude that the ProTEST package is cost saving. Despite moderate adherence, linking prevention and care interventions for TB and HIV resulted in the estimated costs of preventing TB being less than previous estimates of costs of treating it. VCT was less expensive than previously reported in Africa.Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2006;84:528-536.Voir page 534 le résumé en français. En la página 534 figura un resumen en español.

Cost effectiveness of facility and home based HIV voluntary counseling and testing strategies in rural Uganda

“…The cost per client tested for the home-based strategy was comparable to that (US$ 5.88 -8.29) reported in other studies [35][36][37] . Although the cost per client tested in the facility-based strategy reported here was higher than that of home-based VCT, it was lower than that reported elsewhere 31,36,38,39 . The level of care and range of services provided by a facility affects the costs and therefore contributes to the variation in costs observed.…”

“…In the era of antiretroviral treatment (ART) and cotrimoxazole preventive therapy, identification of HIV-infected persons through VCT remains pertinent 31 .…”

Cost-effectiveness analysis for priority-setting in South Africa - what are the possibilities?

“…8 The prevention of TB cost less than previous estimates because of the linkage of prevention and care interventions for both TB and HIV. Voluntary counselling and testing was also found to be less expensive than reported in other African studies.…”

“…8 Preventing TB cost less than previous estimates because of the linkage of prevention and care interventions for both TB and HIV, showing the potential of CEA in encouraging the integration of services. Achieving efficiency at the service level is of particular concern for the more expensive care provided by specialists at regional and December 2010, Vol.…”

Costs and Consequences of Additional Chest X-Ray in a Tuberculosis Prevention Program in Botswana

“…IPT substantially reduces the risk of TB disease in PLWH (9,10) and is cost-effective in Africa (11)(12)(13)(14).…”