1988
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.6.699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cotinine in the serum, saliva, and urine of nonsmokers, passive smokers, and active smokers.

Abstract: Cotinine was measured in the serum, saliva, and urine of nonsmokers, passive smokers, and active smokers. Serum and saliva could not discriminate between nonsmokers and passive smokers. Mean urine cotinine was higher in passive smokers than nonsmokers but there was a great deal of intersubject overlap. Cotinine in all body fluids could separate active smokers from the other two groups. Among smokers, light smokers had lower levels than heavier smokers. (Am J Public Health 1988; 78:699-701.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
121
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
16
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the urine cotinine concentration of those exposed to passive cigarette smoke may be higher, there is considerable overlap with values among non-smokers, 16,17 but little with active smokers. Exposure to passive smoke (cigarette smoke from others' smoking) is likely to be widespread among non-smokers given the high prevalence of smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although the urine cotinine concentration of those exposed to passive cigarette smoke may be higher, there is considerable overlap with values among non-smokers, 16,17 but little with active smokers. Exposure to passive smoke (cigarette smoke from others' smoking) is likely to be widespread among non-smokers given the high prevalence of smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, we used various cotinine cutoffs 33,34 as exposure variables in sensitivity models. Effects from models using multiply imputed values for metals or cotinine were estimated using Rubin's combining rules in SAS (PROC MIANALYZE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the fire fighters (23 of 30) had urinary cotinine concentrations below 30 µg/L. A cotinine level above 30 µg/L has been associated with light tobacco smoking and passive exposure to tobacco smoke, which are both sources of PAH exposure (confounders) [Wall et al 1988]. Therefore, data from subjects with cotinine levels > 30 µg/L are identified in these plots.…”
Section: Correlations Between Exposure and Biomarker Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%