SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1998 1998
DOI: 10.1190/1.1820653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cotton Valley hydraulic fracture imaging project: Feasibility of determining fracture behavior using microseismic event locations and source parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patterns of S-to P-wave energy ratios (Es/Ep) were previously interpreted as an indicator of a non-shear or volumetric component of failure systematically varying along the Cotton Valley treatment lengths (Urbancic and Zinno, 1998;Rutledge and Urbancic, 1999;Mayerhofer et al, 2000). The same data, displayed as amplitude ratios in Figure 12, can instead be attributed to the radiation patterns of two similar, double-couple, shear mechanisms occurring uniformly over the treatment length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Patterns of S-to P-wave energy ratios (Es/Ep) were previously interpreted as an indicator of a non-shear or volumetric component of failure systematically varying along the Cotton Valley treatment lengths (Urbancic and Zinno, 1998;Rutledge and Urbancic, 1999;Mayerhofer et al, 2000). The same data, displayed as amplitude ratios in Figure 12, can instead be attributed to the radiation patterns of two similar, double-couple, shear mechanisms occurring uniformly over the treatment length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, to capture a realistic range of source frequencies, we simulate three source frequencies at 40 Hz, 150 Hz and 300 Hz. Based on Urbancic and Zinno (1998), we define the microseismic moment magnitude to be 4.4 × 10 10 dyne.cm for all source frequencies. We keep the size of the seismic moment constant in all simulations to facilitate waveform comparisons but note here that the source moment magnitude would be smaller for higher dominant frequency sources and larger for lower dominant frequency sources (e.g., see Izutani and Kanamori 2001, Fig .…”
Section: Microseismic Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, it has been suggested that passive seismic monitoring offers an opportunity to image the dimensions of hydraulic fractures by evaluating the distribution of microearthquake locations and their source characteristics (e.g., Urbancic, 1998Urbancic, , 1999 in both space and time (e.g., Maxwell et al, 2000). In this paper, we carry out a general assessment of the microseismic response for stimulations monitored over the past few years in the U.S..…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%