2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00035-018-0214-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could knotweeds invade mountains in their introduced range? An analysis of patches dynamics along an elevational gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation gives a quantitative explanation to empirical and modelling studies indicating that low mowing frequency and/or partial mowing have close to no effects on the cover or expansion dynamics of R. japonica (Gerber et al 2010;Lavallée et al 2019;Martin et al 2019).…”
Section: Establishment Potential and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This observation gives a quantitative explanation to empirical and modelling studies indicating that low mowing frequency and/or partial mowing have close to no effects on the cover or expansion dynamics of R. japonica (Gerber et al 2010;Lavallée et al 2019;Martin et al 2019).…”
Section: Establishment Potential and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Stands of R. japonica frequently grow in habitats that do not experience full sun, or are mowed, such as roadsides, semi-natural riverbanks or forest edges (Beerling et al 1994;Martin et al 2019;Tiébré et al 2008). In those, we may expect clones to adopt tactics to cope with or to avoid the effect of less favorable areas.…”
Section: Clonal Growth Forms and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adding this phenomenon could produce simulation results closer to reality. The field data we have used for the calibration were extracted from Martin et al (2018). The measurements were carried out in 2008 and 2015 on stands that were mown or not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we consider a set of parameters for the plant, and perform a simulation for each of the 19 stands, we obtain 19 × 4 results (real numbers): the areas and sizes of the initial and final populations. We can thus compare these values with the 19 × 4 corresponding observations of Martin et al (2018). The goal is to find a set of parameters for the plant, common to all stands, that best matches the model outputs (area and size) to field observations.…”
Section: The Methods Used For the Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%