Could operational hydrological models be made compatible with satellite soil moisture observations?

Abstract

Soil moisture is a significant state variable in flood forecasting. Nowadays more and more satellite soil moisture products are available, yet their usage in the operational hydrology is still limited. This is because the soil moisture state variables in most operational hydrological models (mostly conceptual models) are over‐simplified—resulting in poor compatibility with the satellite soil moisture observations. A case study is provided to discuss this in more detail, with the adoption of the XAJ model and the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) level‐3 soil moisture observation to illustrate the relevant issues. It is found that there are three distinct deficiencies existed in the XAJ model that could cause the mismatch issues with the SMOS soil moisture observation: (i) it is based on runoff generation via the field capacity excess mechanism (interestingly, such a runoff mechanism is called the saturation excess in XAJ while in fact it is clearly a misnomer); (ii) evaporation occurs at the potential rate in its upper soil layer until the water storage in the upper layer is exhausted, and then the evapotranspiration process from the lower layers will commence – leading to an abrupt soil water depletion in the upper soil layer; (iii) it uses the multi‐bucket concept at each soil layer – hence the model has varied soil layers. Therefore, it is a huge challenge to make an operational hydrological model compatible with the satellite soil moisture data. The paper argues that this is possible and some new ideas have been explored and discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Soil Moisture for Hydrological Applications: Open Questions and New Opportunities

“…Both in situ and satellite data requires a model tailored to their use. It would mean including a shallow soil layer close to the surface and a distributed spatial discretization for fully exploiting the potential of satellite soil moisture observations [112,120]. On the other hand, remote sensing scientists should improve the characterization of the errors associated to the soil moisture products, increase their spatial and temporal resolution, their temporal coverage and temporal consistency.…”

L band microwave remote sensing and land data assimilation improve the representation of prestorm soil moisture conditions for hydrologic forecasting

“…However, a review of these approaches reveals a wide disparity in conclusions regarding the value of soil moisture assimilation for forecasting streamflow [Crow and Ryu, 2009;Massari et al, 2015b;Lievens et al, 2015]. This lack of consistency arises, at least in part, from significant sensitivity to the structure and calibration of the particular hydrologic model applied in the assimilation system [Chen et al, 2011;Zhuo and Han, 2016;Massari et al, 2015a]. Therefore, evaluation results are nonrobust in that they are affected by the accuracy of the assumed parametric relationship connecting precipitation, runoff, and soil moisture imbedded within these models.…”

Spatial Pattern Oriented Multicriteria Sensitivity Analysis of a Distributed Hydrologic Model

“…The SA methods can, therefore, enhance our control on spatiotemporal model behavior [5]. There are local (LSA) and global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods that evaluate distinct and joint effects between different model parameters, respectively [6][7][8].…”