“…These challenges arise in part because much of the early literature on the group is poorly illustrated and species descriptions may not correctly describe the type specimens on which they are based, making it difficult to put names on morphospecies without direct comparison to the original type material (Benayahu, van Ofwegen, & McFadden, ; Halàsz, ; Halàsz, McFadden, Aharonovich, Toonen, & Benayahu, ). In addition, recent taxonomic studies have suggested that morphological features of polyps and sclerites that have traditionally been used to diagnose and distinguish species of xeniids from one another are often unreliable and incongruent with genetically determined species boundaries (Benayahu, van Ofwegen, & McFadden, ; Halàsz, Reynolds, McFadden, Toonen, & Benayahu, ; Halàsz et al., ; McFadden, Brown, et al., ; McFadden et al., ). Although scanning electron microscopy has identified new morphological characters (e.g.…”