“…Here we evaluate and discuss the merits and shortcomings of these two striking opposite strategies by comparing the accuracy of a general-purpose, transferable, FF and a specifically tailored QMD-FF in predicting both the ground state structure and the room temperature Uv-Vis absorption of the octahedral Iron(III) complex with two phtmeimb ligands, were phtmeimb stands for [phenyl(tris(3-methylimidazol-1-ylidene))borate] -(see Figure 1), recently reported by Wärnmark and co-workers [37,84], showing nanosecond ligand-to metal charge-transfer (LMCT) lifetime. For the definition of the QMD-FF, among others [69,[71][72][73][74][75][77][78][79], we here resort to the JOYCE protocol [78,85,86], already successfully employed to study the solvation features of octahedral TMCs [76,87], based on higher-level QM descriptors. Turning to the general-purpose FF, as an example of a transferable black-box approach, the standard General Amber Force Field (GAFF) method [88] was adopted whenever possible, by transferring all bonded FF parameters from the proper GAFF database, while retrieving the missing parameters (involving the metal and Boron sites) from supplementary literature databases, as described in section 3.1.2.…”