2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could refuge theory and rivers acting as barriers explain the genetic variability distribution in the Atlantic Forest?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Guinea highlands are a source of some of West Africa’s largest rivers, including Niger, Gambia, and Senegal rivers. Evidence that rivers may function as barriers for gene dispersal in plant species is limited ( Cazé et al 2016 ; Nazareno et al 2017 ) and we do not expect they acted as a genetic barrier for P. biglobosa . On the contrary, big African rivers represent an important transport system and, consequently, they may have contributed to human-induced gene flow in plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The Guinea highlands are a source of some of West Africa’s largest rivers, including Niger, Gambia, and Senegal rivers. Evidence that rivers may function as barriers for gene dispersal in plant species is limited ( Cazé et al 2016 ; Nazareno et al 2017 ) and we do not expect they acted as a genetic barrier for P. biglobosa . On the contrary, big African rivers represent an important transport system and, consequently, they may have contributed to human-induced gene flow in plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Further, it is highlighted in several biogeographic studies as a place of disjunction (Cazé et al., ; Menezes et al., ; Pinheiro et al., ) or secondary contact (Carnaval, Hickerson, Haddad, Rodrigues, & Moritz, ; Franco & Manfrin, ; Pellegrino, Rodrigues, Harris, Yonenaga‐Yassuda, & Sites, ). As these studies include different organisms with distinct dispersal capacities, such as flies (Franco & Manfrin, ), amphibians (Carnaval et al., ), lizards (Pellegrino et al., ), and plants (Cazé et al., ; Pinheiro et al., ), it is reasonable that asynchrony and recurrent events such as the climatic Pleistocene oscillations could explain some of these empirical observations. However, is also possible that only PRH is an insufficient model to explain all these biogeographic data obtained from groups that diversified in different time scales and in some cases predating the Pleistocene (Pellegrino et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different factors are proposed to explain phylogeographic patterns in BAF, including rivers (e.g., Cazé et al., ; Neto, Furtado, Zappi, Filho, & Forzza, ) and geological faults (Batalha‐Filho et al., ; Thomé, Zamudio, Haddad, & Alexandrino, ; Thomé et al., ) as putative geographic barriers. Further, Pleistocene climatic changes have also been invoked to explain diversification within BAF (e.g., Cabanne et al., ; Cardoso, Cristiano, Tavares, Schubart, & Heinze, ), by persistence of rainforest species in stable areas (refugia) in the northern bioclimatic region and expansion of open vegetation formation in the south (Carnaval et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In plants, higher genetic diversity has been frequently found in zones that had a stable climate during glacial periods and for which post-glacial migration was identified (Faye et al, 2016; Wolfe et al, 2016), and in contrast, unstable regions are expected to represent recently colonized areas and thus exhibit lower genetic diversity (Abellán & Svenning, 2014; Caze et al, 2016; Ornelas, Licona-Vera & Vásquez-Aguilar, 2018). Higher genetic diversity has been found as well in environments that fluctuate in time or space, in which different genotypes can be favored at different times or locations and shifting selection can support higher genetic variation in fitness, even when stabilizing selection is acting to reduce genetic variation (Nadeau, Urban & Bridle, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%