Could robotic‐assisted surgery reduce mesh‐related complications after ventral mesh rectopexy? Experience of a tertiary centre and systematic review of the literature

Abstract

AimThe development of robotic assistance has made dissection and suturing in the deep pelvis much easier. The augmented quality of the images and the articulation of the robotic arms have also enabled a more precise dissection. The aim of this study is to present the data on robotic‐assisted ventral mesh rectopexy procedures in a university hospital and examine the literature in terms of mesh erosion.MethodThe electronic databases Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane were searched. Studies from January 2004 until January 2023 in the English language were included. Studies which included fewer than 10 patients were excluded. Laparoscopic or robotic‐assisted ventral mesh rectopexies were included. Mesh erosion rates following laparoscopic or robotic‐assisted ventral mesh rectopexies were measured.ResultsOverall, the systematic review presents 5911 patients from 43 studies who underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy compared with 746 patients treated with robotic‐assisted ventral mesh rectopexy from six studies and our centre. Mesh erosion was rare in both groups; however, the prevalence was greater in the laparoscopy group (0.90% vs. 0.27%).ConclusionThe mesh erosion rates are very low with robotic‐assisted ventral mesh rectopexy. For precise results, more studies and experience in robotic surgery are required.