2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1485-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could taxonomic misnaming threaten the ex situ conservation and the usage of plant genetic resources?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar non-representative locations have been noted for other molluscan (Ponder et al, 2001) and vascular plant (Palmer, 1995) collection data. The misidentification rate we observed is also well within the bounds reported for other taxonomic groups, including 27% for freshwater clams (Shea, Peterson, Wisniewski, & Johnson, 2011), 20% for bird holdings in the Šariš Museum (Mikula, Csanády, & Hromada, 2018), 20% for fungi used in molecular analyses (Bridge, Roberts, Spooner, & Panchal, 2003) and 10% for germplasm holdings of Citrullus (watermelons) in international seed banks (Guzzon & Ardenghi, 2018).…”
Section: Impli C Ati On S For Mus Eum Record Us Esupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Similar non-representative locations have been noted for other molluscan (Ponder et al, 2001) and vascular plant (Palmer, 1995) collection data. The misidentification rate we observed is also well within the bounds reported for other taxonomic groups, including 27% for freshwater clams (Shea, Peterson, Wisniewski, & Johnson, 2011), 20% for bird holdings in the Šariš Museum (Mikula, Csanády, & Hromada, 2018), 20% for fungi used in molecular analyses (Bridge, Roberts, Spooner, & Panchal, 2003) and 10% for germplasm holdings of Citrullus (watermelons) in international seed banks (Guzzon & Ardenghi, 2018).…”
Section: Impli C Ati On S For Mus Eum Record Us Esupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For instance, the PlantSearch database currently does not make locality and coordinate‐level information available, and the presence of a taxon in a botanic garden as listed in the database indicates at least one accession (but no information on the actual number). Furthermore, taxonomic information in germplasm databases for members of the plant family has been recognized to be in need of improvement (Guzzon & Ardenghi, ). If these information constraints were to be remedied, it is possible that the ex situ conservation status of the taxa could be revised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clonal propagation of material allows for the easy replication of collections across geographic sites, a noteworthy standard of living germplasm collections as outlined by the FAO (2016). However, clonal reproduction also complicates germplasm curation, facilitating the mislabeling of individuals as homonyms or synonyms and hindering both conservation and utilization of these important genetic resources (Guzzon and Ardenghi, 2018). To reduce unnecessary duplicates and mislabeled individuals within and between collections, careful curation that integrates phenotypic and genetic information, as described above, is required for perennial crop collections.…”
Section: Maintaining Living Collectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%