2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019jf005418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could the Last Interglacial Constrain Projections of Future Antarctic Ice Mass Loss and Sea‐Level Rise?

Abstract: Previous studies have interpreted Last Interglacial (LIG; ∼129-116 ka) sea-level estimates in multiple different ways to calibrate projections of future Antarctic ice-sheet (AIS) mass loss and associated sea-level rise. This study systematically explores the extent to which LIG constraints could inform future Antarctic contributions to sea-level rise. We develop a Gaussian process emulator of an ice-sheet model to produce continuous probabilistic projections of Antarctic sea-level contributions over the LIG an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(181 reference statements)
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimate is commonly cited as the maximum contribution of WAIS to peak GMSL during the last interglacial (LIG; ~130 to 116 ka) (19)(20)(21)(22)(23). A total Antarctic contribution to the LIG higher than this would thus imply melt from the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) (24)(25)(26). Furthermore, when combined with independent estimates of GMSL changes associated with the Greenland Ice Sheet (18,24,(27)(28)(29), mountain glaciers (30), and thermal expansion (31), the estimate of 3.26 m has led to the view that the lower bound on a widely cited estimate of peak GMSL during the LIG [5.5 to 9 m; (19,32)] requires no contribution from the EAIS, while it is likely that the upper bound does (33).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimate is commonly cited as the maximum contribution of WAIS to peak GMSL during the last interglacial (LIG; ~130 to 116 ka) (19)(20)(21)(22)(23). A total Antarctic contribution to the LIG higher than this would thus imply melt from the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) (24)(25)(26). Furthermore, when combined with independent estimates of GMSL changes associated with the Greenland Ice Sheet (18,24,(27)(28)(29), mountain glaciers (30), and thermal expansion (31), the estimate of 3.26 m has led to the view that the lower bound on a widely cited estimate of peak GMSL during the LIG [5.5 to 9 m; (19,32)] requires no contribution from the EAIS, while it is likely that the upper bound does (33).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here paleo records, rather than historical records, can serve as an important constraint for models. We note that a credible equilibrium response does not guarantee a credible transient sensitivity as the equilibrium can be approached at different speeds (Gilford et al., 2020 ). Finally, we associate about 90% of SLR since the start of the twentieth century with anthropogenic global warming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The lateral boundaries of the ice sheet are free to evolve (Winkelmann et al, 2011). Subgrid parameterisations are used to describe the positions of the ice shelf calving fronts (Albrecht et al, 2011) and the grounding lines (Gladstone et al, 2010;Feldmann et al, 2014). Calving is described using the physically based two-dimensional parameterisation of Levermann et al (2012).…”
Section: Marine Ice Sheetsmentioning
confidence: 99%