2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could transdermal estradiol+progesterone be a safer postmenopausal HRT? A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 220 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transdermal ERT has minimal, if any, effect on hepatic clotting factor production and other protein changes associated with the liver first-pass effect. Whereas oral ERT in postmenopausal women is associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism [20,21,22], breast cancer [23], reduced insulin-like growth factor-I levels, increased fat mass and reduced lean body mass [24], none of these effects are evident with transdermal ERT. Furthermore, studies on physiological sex steroid replacement therapy (transdermal E 2 and progesterone) in postmenopausal women and women with premature ovarian failure resulted in lower blood pressure and improved renal function compared to oral regimens [22,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transdermal ERT has minimal, if any, effect on hepatic clotting factor production and other protein changes associated with the liver first-pass effect. Whereas oral ERT in postmenopausal women is associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism [20,21,22], breast cancer [23], reduced insulin-like growth factor-I levels, increased fat mass and reduced lean body mass [24], none of these effects are evident with transdermal ERT. Furthermore, studies on physiological sex steroid replacement therapy (transdermal E 2 and progesterone) in postmenopausal women and women with premature ovarian failure resulted in lower blood pressure and improved renal function compared to oral regimens [22,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas oral ERT in postmenopausal women is associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism [20,21,22], breast cancer [23], reduced insulin-like growth factor-I levels, increased fat mass and reduced lean body mass [24], none of these effects are evident with transdermal ERT. Furthermore, studies on physiological sex steroid replacement therapy (transdermal E 2 and progesterone) in postmenopausal women and women with premature ovarian failure resulted in lower blood pressure and improved renal function compared to oral regimens [22,25]. Transdermal ERT in girls with TS has shown a faster bone accrual in the spine, increased uterine growth, improved overall body composition and lower luteinizing hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations compared to oral ERT [17,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 claiM 2: coMpounding provides iMproved delivery and toleraBility oF Ht Compounded medications require a written prescription from a licensed physician. Prescriptions filled in a compounding pharmacy are prepared, mixed, and assembled according to the specifications of the prescriber.…”
Section: Claims About Cbht Claim 1: Compounded Bht Is Safer Than Fda-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 It is unknown whether the increased risk of breast cancer in the E+P arm of the WHI vs the estrogen-only arm was the result of the addition of a progestin, the specific combination and dosage of E+P that was used in the trial, or the specific type of progestin (MPA) that was used. 27 For many clinicians, the preferred progesterone formulation has been Prometrium (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), the FDA-approved, micronized formulation of oral progesterone, because it is identical to endogenous progesterone and has improved bioavailability. 38 In an observational study, a decreased risk of histology-and hormone receptor-defined invasive breast cancer was noted with use of a combination of micronized progesterone and estrogen vs the use of synthetic progestogens; however, further study is needed to establish long-term safety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24: 1796-1806 (2010) exerted a protective effect on bone, increasing BMD and decreasing fracture incidence (Tarakida et al, 2007;Gambacciani et al, 2007). According to the recent review of the WHI investigators (L'Hermite et al, 2008), HRT seems to be a valid option, especially in osteopenic women. During the short-term fracture-healing period (4-10 weeks), the positive effects of estrogen administration may outweigh the negative effects observed during long-term treatment (Stuermer et al, 2008;Kolios et al, , 2010a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%