1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00605-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coulomb correlation effects in variable-range hopping thermopower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Efros‐Shklovskii (E–S) hopping model, which takes into account Coulomb interactions between carriers, predicts σ ∝ exp(− T 0 / T ) 1/2 and a temperature independent Seebeck coefficient. [ 61 ] Our measured S can plausibly be fitted to either T 1/2 and T 1/3 , but both log σ – T (–1/4) and log σ – T (–1/3) plots apparently deviate from the expected linear dependence (Figure S23, Supporting Information). Other hopping‐dominating transport models NNH, ME, and PH, with σ ∝ exp(– E a / k B T ) and S ∝ E a / k B T , predict log σ – T –1 and S – T –1 plots are linear and have a same slope [ 62,63 ] ; however our data largely deviate from both linear mathematical expressions (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Transport Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The Efros‐Shklovskii (E–S) hopping model, which takes into account Coulomb interactions between carriers, predicts σ ∝ exp(− T 0 / T ) 1/2 and a temperature independent Seebeck coefficient. [ 61 ] Our measured S can plausibly be fitted to either T 1/2 and T 1/3 , but both log σ – T (–1/4) and log σ – T (–1/3) plots apparently deviate from the expected linear dependence (Figure S23, Supporting Information). Other hopping‐dominating transport models NNH, ME, and PH, with σ ∝ exp(– E a / k B T ) and S ∝ E a / k B T , predict log σ – T –1 and S – T –1 plots are linear and have a same slope [ 62,63 ] ; however our data largely deviate from both linear mathematical expressions (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Transport Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 85%