1954
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.96.426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coulomb Excitation Process in the Lighter Odd-Mass Nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

1956
1956
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Insufficiently thin targets are revealed by their steeper excitation functions ; the ultimate test of a thin target is to observe no further change in shape of the excitation curve upon using a thinner target, i.e., one yielding less radiation. The modifications introduced into the si�ple, semi-classical expression by the WKB approximation (5 1) were definitely needed to improve the agreement with the observed shapes of the excitation functions (58). However, no evidence for the type of behavior illustrated in Figure 2 for low values of '17. was found within the accuracy of these experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Insufficiently thin targets are revealed by their steeper excitation functions ; the ultimate test of a thin target is to observe no further change in shape of the excitation curve upon using a thinner target, i.e., one yielding less radiation. The modifications introduced into the si�ple, semi-classical expression by the WKB approximation (5 1) were definitely needed to improve the agreement with the observed shapes of the excitation functions (58). However, no evidence for the type of behavior illustrated in Figure 2 for low values of '17. was found within the accuracy of these experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Unfortunately there exists no case of a pure M1 transition which does not admit of E2 excitation alsoY How· ever, in two cases of very small E2 admixture (La l 39 and Pr141) no evidence of any Coulomb excitation was found in spite of conditions comparing favor ably as to excitation energy with neighboring nuclei (98). In addition, sev eral cases with measurable E2 components but predominant Ml matrix elements show that Ml Coulomb excitation is unimportant (58). This merely bears out what is expected theoretically in view of the depressing influence of the retardation factor vic for (relatively) slow particles and magnetic transitions on the one hand, and what is known empirically for the size of the quantity B (Ml) on the other hand (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations